NFPA-70E Compliance Takes More Than A Label

Since the release of IEEE-1584 in Septembersources, energized capacitors, undocumented
2002 and NFPA-70E, 2004 Edition, I have talkedswitching conditions, and unknown voltages, in
with hundreds of facility engineers concernedaddition to the problem of not being able to
about NFPA-70E arc flash hazard compliance.accurately perform lock-out-tag-out procedures.
NFPA, the IEEE Safety Committee, and otherThis is one of the most neglected aspects of
groups have done a great job of spreading theelectrical safety in our industry. Very few of the
word regarding arc-flash hazards and the need tofacilities I have reviewed in the past 20 years
address this specific safety issue.maintain accurate electrical one-line diagrams.
Unfortunately, most engineers I have spoken withAccurate one-lines make good business sense
are under the misconception that if they labelbecause work will get done more quickly,
equipment for arc-flash hazards, and enforce theefficiently, and safely.
use of personal protective equipment (PPE) perArticle 400.5, 400.6 Equipment duty verification --
the label, they are in compliance with 70E andAnother important aspect is proper application and
OSHA requirements. Nothing could be furtherrating of equipment for the available short circuit
from the truth. Arc-flash hazard labeling and PPEduty. One facility I reviewed recently had
compliance are only a small part of 70Eunderrated 13.8 kV breakers in an open
compliance and even a smaller part of a properlyswitchyard. We informed them of the problem,
defined safety program.but management did not take the warning
Very few facility engineers appear to understandseriously, since it had operated for twenty years
the thought process behind 70E or the basis forwithout a problem. We were called in
the standard. If maintenance people are notapproximately a year later to inspect one unit
informed why they must work within certainthat had exploded into hundreds of pieces of
safety constraints, then the arc-flash label andshrapnel-like metal!
PPE requirements become merely another taskAlmost every facility has improperly applied
that can be sidestepped.equipment that will not withstand the available
Safety as a principlefault current and potentially will not clear an
Gary McGuire, a safety manager for a large pulparc-hazard. These types of accidents, while not
and paper mill in the Northwest says, "Safetycommon, are very dangerous. Properly rated and
must be operated by principal, not practice." Heverified equipment makes good business sense.
stresses the "why" of safety, not just the dosUnplanned outages and disaster recovery costs
and don'ts of a task. This knowledge gives peopleare expensive, and improperly rated and applied
confronted with something out of the ordinary,equipment can be considered negligence.
the background to understand the potentialArticle 110.7, and 130.1-3 Electrical Safety
dangers, enabling them to make safe choices.Program, Work Permits -- In my opinion, this is
Safety is a culture that must be ingrained withthe heart of 70E and worker safety. Without
principal. This culture starts from management andsafety program principals, procedures, hazard/risk
filters down to the worker where ultimateevaluation, work permits, and job briefing and
responsibility rests.planning, safety is relegated to a mere label with a
The current arc-flash phenomenon appears to bePPE number. Workers are then left to fend for
operating on fear rather than principal. The fear isthemselves "to get the job done" as many have
massive lawsuits and OSHA fines if an accidentdone for years. When workers do not receive
does occur rather than a sound reasoning as tomanagerial support and are tasked with dangerous
why a safety culture makes good business sensejob functions, their morale deteriorates and
in daily operations. While it may have taken someincidents increase. This seems to be an
fear in the initial movement to motivateunrecognized cost in today's business culture.
companies toward implementing safety standards,NFPA-70E is a comprehensive document that
if the safety aspect of arcflash is limited toapproaches safety from a system viewpoint, just
labeling and PPE requirements, the inclination willas system engineers do when analyzing an
soon wear off.electrical system. While I do not agree with
Labeling or stating PPE requirements will noteverything in 70E, I do believe the standard is well
prevent accidents. Accidents are prevented andlaid out and provides sufficient flexibility to allow
lives are saved through a foundation of safety.tailoring a safety program to the individual facility.
NFPA-70E and the safety cultureThis is an important step in developing a "safety
Several aspects of 70E in particular make goodculture" for your facility.
business sense and help promote a safety cultureAs the word continues to spread regarding 70E,
in your facility:we hope more companies will begin to understand
Article 205.2, 120.2(F)(1)(a) Updated and verifiedthat labels and PPE do not fulfill the requirements
one-line diagram -- An updated and accuratefor 70E compliance. Worker safety can only be
electrical one-line diagram is an essential ingredientimplemented through principals and culture, which
for electrical safety. If workers do not have anwill in the long term pay benefits to the bottom
accurate map of the system, they can beline.
exposed to potential back feeds from alternate