Protect your workers with the right equipment


Will the UK Waste Industry Achieve Safe Compliance with the ATEX Regulations in time?

Waste Management Operators may have done allretained on site showing the locations and
they can to maintain good health and safetyextent of these ATEX area classification
practices in the past, and will continue tozones, and each zone must be marked on site
do so; but how many will be compliant afterby a sign. These zones will all need defining
30th July 2006 when the EU's ATEX Directiveindividually for each site on the basis of a
finally  comes  into  force?risk assessment. The ICoPs recommend the best
person to carry out these assessments will
The EU Directive applies to all workplacesnormally  be  the  site  manager.
where the risk of the presence of an
Explosible Atmosphere exists, and encompasses(Please  include the ATEX sign graphic here.)
all installations from waste transfer and
processing plant (where explosive dusts, andThis requirement is in addition to the normal
unused solvents may create an explosivepractice of writing method statements based
atmosphere), to any landfill - no matter howupon risk assessments, plus internal H&S
long since closed and made over to other useschecks, and Supervisor approvals in place in
- which possesses any wells (for gas orcompanies already, as has been the case since
leachate monitoring or management) in gassingthe introduction of various health and safety
waste.legislation  in  the  1980s.
Although the large waste operators have beenA major area of concern remains in respect of
actively tackling the issues surrounding ATEXthe impact which the DSEAR will have on the
compliance at their waste collection,after-use and restoration of landfill sites,
transfer and processing facilities, and onand such matters need to be taken on-board by
their (mostly active) landfill sites, mostthe planners when after-use policy is
landfills are historical and fall into theestablished for sites. The directive is
"closed" category. In this area there hasexplicit and prescriptive in that each zone
been very little activity to review oldarea must be signed, and it is clear that
sites, assess which exhibit the potential forthese zones extend into the general airspace
an explosive atmosphere to be present, andaround and above chambers, wells, and
compile the necessary risk assessment,boreholes etc. Just how this can be squared
ameliorative, training and record keepingwith public access uses such as golfing, and
actions  needed  for  compliance.even dog-walking has yet to be resolved - yet
the defined zones apply to workplace
Similarly, activity would seem to have beenactivities and not the public usage of the
minimal in reviewing and risk assessingsite.
existing leachate treatment and methane
stripping  plant  for  compliance  -  so far.Generally, the ICoPs give guidance which by
its specificity will clarify the
Even within the big five UK waste operatorsinterpretation DSEAR requirements and reduce
active sites there are real problems incosts to an affordable level. Detailed
interpreting the requirements and inreading of the ICoPs should do much to allay
achieving compliance, and much of this arisesconcerns that wholesale replacement of
from the inherent difficulty in applyingequipment which has given long-term incident
regulations which were originally perceivedfree service over many sites and for extended
for factory and industrial workplaces, to aperiods, would be required just to comply
landfill  setting.with  the  directive.
However, the industry has been activelyThere have however, already reportedly been
working to solve the matter. For more thansubstantial costs to some major operators in
the past 12 months the waste industry haspreparation for DSEAR. SITA themselves have
been endeavoring to tackle the various issuesbeen reported as finding it necessary to
surrounding ATEX compliance, as regulatedspend between £50,000 and £100,000 per
under the UK's instrument known as the DSEARflare, on changing 18 of its landfill gas
(Dangerous Substances and Explosiveflares on sites around the country to comply.
Atmosphere Regulations). A working group has
been meeting, and is currently well advancedSuch high costs are likely to be the
in its programme to produce six Industryexception rather than the rule, and costs
Codes of Practice to provide comprehensivewill be best controlled by careful reading,
guidance on the application DSEAR to alland in-depth knowledge, of the ICoPS.
waste  management  activities.Although not all ICoPs have yet been
published, reviews can be undertaken in full
The first Code (ICoP1) was published inknowledge of the approach being taken by the
Autumn 2005, and establishes generalICoP committee. Industry participants will
principles of compliance, provides basicnormally also be provided with final drafts
calculations for establishing ATEX Areaof ICoPs prior to publication for their
Classification ("Zones") around landfillcomments,  on  request.
wells, boreholes etc., and provides examples
of  the  most  common  zoning.So the message is that all Site Managers,
Estate Managers with former landfills as part
ICoP 2 is titled, "Area Classification forof their landholding portfolios, and the
Landfill Gas Extraction, Utilisation &Waste Disposal Officers for Council's
Combustion", and was published in Novemberresponsible for closed landfill should be
2005.aware of this legislation and should be
making it their duty to familiarise
ICoP 3; "Area classification for leachatethemselves with the ICoPs, and then carry out
extraction, treatment and disposal", has nowtheir reviews, and all this needs to be done
also recently been published, and a furtherby  the  end  of  this  month  (June).
ICoP  on Landfill Operation is well advanced.
By taking this approach DSEAR compliance
All these documents are approved by theshould become both affordable, and reduce
Health & Safety Executive, beforeinjuries from these risks. Whether the rate
publication, and are available for freeof injury directly from the risks covered by
download  on  the  ESA  web  sitethese regulations was ever sufficiently high
for any statistically relevant Health and
All operators will find that changes toSafety gain ever to be seen is doubtful, but
existing practices will be required in orderwe hope we are proved wrong, and that the
to comply with the DSEAR. Previous procedurespassage of time will reveal real benefits to
for carrying out risk assessments andthe industries workforce. In any event, the
establishing safe working methods will needimplementation of these regulations will go
to be re-assessed and modified to comply withahead on 1 July, so the wise will go ahead
the new DSEAR Zoning requirements.now  and  comply  as  a  matter  of  urgency.
Specifications for equipment will require
review and either ATEX Certified equipmentNote 1: The article refers to the "ATEX
installed, or a site specific risk assessmentDirective", for brevity, however, the DSEAR
undertaken to justify each plant installationactually implements two EU Directives on the
is "appropriately" certified if ATEXsubject, namely: The ATEX Product Directive,
Certificates are not available for existingand  the  ATEX  Worker  Protection Directive.
plant,  as  required under these regulations.
Note 2: The term "ATEX" is derived from a
All staff and operatives will in future undershortening of the words ATmosphere and
these regulations be required to be trainedEXplosible.
specifically in atmospheric explosion risk
management in general, and in the meaning of(Steve Last served on the committee in
three ATEX Zones, each of which reflect thepreparation of ICoP 3, and has commented on
degree of risk within one of three classifiedothers.
risk severity situations. Drawings must be



1 A B C D 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 73 74 75 76 77 78 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 96 97 99 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109