Ozone Air Purifiers May Cause Permanent Lung Damage

Several manufacturers are currently selling ozoneshows that at concentrations that do not exceed
generators as air cleaners. The companiespublic health standards, ozone has little potential to
manufacturing these devices state they are saferemove indoor air contaminants, though it still has
and effective at controlling indoor air pollution;the longterm potential to cause lung irritation.
however, for almost a century healthVendors claim that ozone will render almost every
professionals and health organizations such as thechemical contaminant harmless through a chemical
American Lung Association have challenged thesereaction whose only by-products are carbon
claims.dioxide, oxygen and water. This is false
Sellers of ozone-producing devices often useadvertising for several reasons.
fanciful terms to describe ozone. It is referred toFirst, it takes months to years for ozone to react
in such terms as "activated oxygen" or "pure air",with many of the chemicals commonly found in
which suggest that ozone is merely a healthy kindindoor air (Boeniger, 1995); so for all practical
of oxygen. However, ozone is a toxic gas whichpurposes, this is useless. Also, ozone generators
has vastly different chemical and toxicologicalwill not remove carbon monoxide (Salls, 1927;
properties compared to oxygen.Shaughnessy et al., 1994) or formaldehyde
Ozone is a molecule composed of three atoms of(Esswein and Boeniger, 1994).
oxygen, as opposed to the oxygen we normallySecondly, in many cases where the reaction
breath, which has two. The O2 molecule is stablebetween the pollutants and ozone does occur
and nonreactive, whereas the O3 molecule isreadily, the by-products are as harmful or irritating
unstable, tending to dissociate and produce an O2as the original pollutants (Weschler et al., 1992a,
molecule and one single ionized oxygen atom. This1992b, 1996; Zhang and Lioy, 1994).
single atom acts as a "free radicle", that is, itFor instance, a laboratory experiment was
reacts with other nearby substances and changesconducted which mixed ozone with chemicals
their chemical composition. It is this ability tofrom new carpet. Ozone did reduce many of the
combine with other substances that forms thechemicals, including those which can produce "new
basis of manufacturers? claims that it binds upcarpet" odor. However, the reaction produced a
organic particles in the air and removes themvariety of aldehydes, and the total concentration
from circulation.of organic chemicals in the air actually increased
Unfortunately, the same chemical properties which(Weschler, et. al., 1992b). Levels of irritating formic
allow ozone to react with organic material in theacid also rise (Zhang and Lioy, 1994).
environment also give it the ability to react withSome of the byproducts of ozone reaction are
similar organic material in the body, with potentiallythemselves reactive and go on to produce further
harmful health consequences. When inhaled, ozoneirritating and corrosive by-products (Weschler and
can damage the lungs, and it is considered anShields, 1996, 1997a, 1997b). Ozone producing
undesirable substance that is a component ofdevices turn an indoor environment into a
smog.seething chemical flask.
Inhalation of ozone at even low amounts canThird, ozone by itself does not remove airborne
cause respiratory problems and throat irritation. Inparticles such as pollen and housedust. However,
addition, ozone worsens chronic respiratorysome ozone generators are manufactured with
diseases such as asthma and impairs the body'san "ion generator" or "ionizer" in the same unit to
natural ability to fight respiratory infections.disperse negatively (and/or positively) charged
A generally accepted theory of aging states thations into the air. These ions attach to particles in
the cells of the human body age both due tothe air giving them a negative (or positive) charge
genetic factors (loss of cell telomeres) andso that the particles may attach to nearby
oxidative damage by free radicals. People aresurfaces such as walls or furniture, creating an
encouraged to eat a diet high in antioxidants, andundesirable grimy layer; or attach to one another
many take antioxidant supplements, precisely toand settle out of the air. In recent experiments,
avoid the kind of damage caused by reactiveionizers proved ineffective in removing dust,
substances such as ozone.tobacco smoke, pollen or fungal spores compared
Most people recover from acute exposure toto either high efficiency particle filters or
ozone, but according to a 1996 EPA study,electrostatic precipitators. (Shaughnessy et al.,
long-term exposure may cause permanent lung1994; Pierce, et al., 1996).
damage. The EPA regards ozone as an airEven at concentrations that greatly exceed public
pollutant and has formulated air quality standardshealth standards, ozone is ineffective at cleaning
to enable local officials to warn the public whenthe air. And unfortunately, there is evidence to
ozone levels in urban areas are excessive. Whensuggest that in some circumstances ozone
ozone (and other air pollutants) are high,generating devices exceed tolerable output limits.
asthmatics and patients with chronic lung diseaseDue to the varying brands and models of these
are encouraged to stay inside, and healthy peoplemachines, and the different room sizes in which
are told to refrain from strenuous outdoorthey are eventually used, there can be great
exercise which raises their breathing rate in thevariation in the eventual concentration of ozone in
toxic air. Since people are advised to avoid ozonethe air.
in the outdoor environment, it is difficult toIn a study by Shaughnessy and Oatman (1991), a
understand why anyone would buy a device tolarge ozone generator recommended by the
purposely produce it within their own homes.manufacturer for spaces "up to 3,000 square
The FDA requires ozone output of indoor medicalfeet," was placed in a 350 square foot room and
devices to be less than 0.05 ppm. Therun at a high setting. The ozone in the room
Occupational Safety and Health Administrationquickly reached hazardous levels of 0.50 to 0.80
(OSHA) requires that workers' exposure to ozoneppm, 5-10 times higher than public health limits.
not exceed an average concentration of moreIn a 1995 EPA study, several different ozone
than 0.10 ppm for 8 hours. The National Institutegenerators were tested in a home environment,
of Occupational Safety And Health (NIOSH)in rooms of various sizes, with doors alternately
recommends an upper limit of 0.10 ppm whichopened and closed, and with the central ventilation
should not be exceeded even briefly. EPA?ssystem fan alternately turned on and off. The
National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone isresults showed that some ozone generators,
a maximum 8 hour average outdoorwhen run at maximum settings in a sealed room,
concentration of 0.08 ppm.frequently produced hazardous concentrations of
The EPA coined the phrase "good up high -bad0.20 - 0.30 ppm. When the units were run at
nearby" to differentiate between ozone in thelesser settings, with interior doors opened,
upper and lower atmosphere. Stratospheric ozoneconcentrations generally remained within public
in the upper atmosphere about 10 to 50kmhealth standards.
(32,000 to 164,000 feet) above Earth's surfaceDue to this wide variation in output and
helps filter out damaging ultraviolet solar radiation.concentration, it is impossible for consumers to
This ozone layer is being decimated by CFCknow how much ozone is actually in the air they
compounds used in refrigerators and coolantare breathing; in many ordinary circumstances,
systems. After negotiation of an internationalozone generators can produce toxic levels. At
treaty, the Montreal Protocol, CFC production wasleast one manufacturer is selling machines
sharply limited beginning in 1987 and phased outequipped with ozone sensors that turn the
completely by 1996, and a study by themachine on and off in response to ambient ozone
American Geophysical Union shows the rate oflevels, in order to maintain levels of this entirely
stratospheric ozone destruction slowing.undesirable gas within a"safe" range. The EPA is
Ozone Generators are ineffective in controllingcurrently conducting tests to evaluating the
indoor air pollution, because scientific evidencereliability of these sensors.