PR Stunts Don't Impress The Superbug

A junior doctor has said that attempts to wipedisease."
out the superbug are nothing more than aSkip forward a couple of years and Health
government PR exercise. Max Pemberton, writingSecretary Alan Johnson was putting infection at
in his Daily Telegraph column, described recentthe top of his priority list. Speaking last November
policies as no more than an attempt to reassurehe vowed to 'fight infection on the front line,' and
the public, with no actual clinical worth.launched a range of measures to combat the bug.
"Under the dress-code policy rolled out in hospitals"To ensure patients' safety I want a regulator
last month, doctors are not allowed on to a wardwith the power to close, clean and then re-open
wearing a coat or outer garment, and they mustwards if necessary," he said. "This tough regime
have their shirt sleeves rolled up to their elbows,will not just apply across the NHS but in the
with no watches or other jewelery," wrote Drprivate sector as well."
Pemberton. "This purports to be an attempt toIt is hard to believe that hospitals are genuinely
reduce hospital-acquired infections being spread bydirtier than they were thirty or forty years ago
staff."though. It may be good PR to introduce more
"No one would question the importance of handmatrons and remove doctor's wrist watches, but
washing in clinical settings. But as doctors, we areit this really going to see off a superbug?
encouraged to practise evidence-based medicine,The answer may come in reducing the amount of
so I would expect there to be some evidenceantibiotics that doctors use. MRSA great danger is
that a blanket 'bare below the elbows' policythat it is unaffected by many types of antibiotics,
works," he added. "It's meaningless, a waste ofand that the delay in finding an effective
time and money, and it won't help make hospitalstreatment gives a patient the time to get
any safer."seriously sick. MRSA was first discovered in 1961,
But if these measures are useless, then whatabout the time that penicillin use began to become
measures can be taken to reduce infections thatalmost ubiquitous.
are becoming an increasing problem in our"In the old days, before we had problems with
hospitals? It has been claimed that infections kill atresistance, people thought it really didn't matter -
least 5,000 people in UK hospitals every year, andyou could throw antibiotics at these cases and
a recent survey showed that one in five peopleyou would pick up the odd one that was treatable
who contract MRSA are dead within a year. It isthat way," said Dr Mark Enright, an MRSA expert
clearly a serious problem, yet despite the hugeat Imperial College London.
amounts of publicity given to the issue littleJohnson has ordered GPs to cut back on the
progress seems to have been made.amount antibiotics dolled out to patients, and
Back in 2005 the Office for National Statisticsmany doctors support his move.
recorded 1,629 deaths as a result of MRSA - a"The use of antibiotics have saved countless lives,
big increase on the years before. It did not feelbut antibiotics do not work on most coughs, colds
that this was necessarily the result of hospitalsand sore throats and their unnecessary use can
getting dirtier though, and instead, said that theleave the body susceptible to gut infections like
main reason for the sudden upturn was:Clostridium difficile ," said Johnson recently. He will
"improved levels of reporting, possibly broughthope that his latest move proves more
about by the continued high public profile of thesuccessful than his previous ones.